From: "Rui Miguel Silva" <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng " <yanzheng@21cn.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]] Btrfs: fix destroy snapshot to get the right parent dentry
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:00:28 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.u2u7e0budmptbl@gentoo-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d0408630911031520k78af1c39g16988123739a16e2@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:20:02 -0000, Yan, Zheng <yanzheng@21cn.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> In snapshot destroy the dentry used for parent was the snapshot dentry
>> itself. Remove d_invalidate since always return EBUSY, making possible
>> to remove a snapshot using the btrfsctl -D option.
>>
>
> This is not correct. The snapshot destroy ioctl receives two parameters.
> The first one provides directory that the snapshot is in, the second one
> provides the name of snapshot..
>
> The usage of 'btrfsctl -D' is:
> btrfsctl -D [name of snapshot] [directory that holds the snapshot]
>
> Yan, Zheng
>
Hi,
thanks for the explanation. I just saw the usage output: " [-D dir .]"
"-D: delete snapshot" and I didn't understand it like the usage that you
explained above.
I understood it like this: btrfsctl -D relative/path/to/snapshot comparing
to the -s option "-s snap_name dir: creates a new snapshot of dir" which
is more clear.
That makes the patch completely wrong. Once again many thanks.
Cheers,
-- Rui
>
>> Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index cdbb054..fe6ac9a 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ out:
>> static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
>> void __user *arg)
>> {
>> - struct dentry *parent = fdentry(file);
>> + struct dentry *parent = file->f_path.dentry->d_parent;
>> struct dentry *dentry;
>> struct inode *dir = parent->d_inode;
>> struct inode *inode;
>> @@ -793,9 +793,6 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct
>> file *file,
>> dest = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> - err = d_invalidate(dentry);
>> - if (err)
>> - goto out_unlock;
>>
>> down_write(&root->fs_info->subvol_sem);
>>
>> @@ -827,7 +824,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct
>> file *file,
>> inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
>> out_up_write:
>> up_write(&root->fs_info->subvol_sem);
>> -out_unlock:
>> +
>> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> if (!err) {
>> shrink_dcache_sb(root->fs_info->sb);
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 16:10 [PATCH]] Btrfs: fix destroy snapshot to get the right parent dentry Rui Miguel Silva
2009-11-03 23:20 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-11-04 10:00 ` Rui Miguel Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.u2u7e0budmptbl@gentoo-vm \
--to=rmfrfs@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yanzheng@21cn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox