From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from linux-libre.fsfla.org ([208.118.235.54]:42876 "EHLO linux-libre.fsfla.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751454AbaHaSHj (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:07:39 -0400 From: Alexandre Oliva To: Shriramana Sharma Cc: linux-btrfs Subject: Re: btrfs: add -k option to filesystem df References: Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:07:32 -0300 In-Reply-To: (Shriramana Sharma's message of "Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:48:33 +0530") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Aug 30, 2014, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > But somehow I feel the name of the long option could be made better than > --kbytes which is not exactly descriptive of what it accomplishes. IIUC so > far only bytes are displayed right? kbytes displays KiBs, whereas the preexisting code chooses a magnitude most suitable to present the size in a human-friendly way. I'd be happy to drop the long option, to follow GNU df's practice: there's no long option (without arguments) equivalent to -k there. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer