From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: collapse concurrent forced allocations
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:18:29 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <orvc9jp0zu.fsf@livre.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130222155403.GC2062@localhost.localdomain> (Josef Bacik's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:54:03 -0500")
On Feb 22, 2013, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> wrote:
> So I understand what you are getting at, but I think you are doing it wrong. If
> we're calling with CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE, but somebody has already started to
> allocate with CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE, we'll reset the space_info->force_alloc to
> our original caller's CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE.
But that's ok, do_chunk_alloc will set space_info->force_alloc to
CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE at the end, when it succeeds allocating, and then
anyone else waiting on the mutex to try to allocate will load the
NO_FORCE from space_info.
> So we only really care about making sure a chunk is actually
> allocated, instead of doing this flag shuffling we should just do
> if (space_info->chunk_alloc) {
> spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
> wait_event(!space_info->chunk_alloc);
> return 0;
> }
Sorry, I don't follow.
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-23 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 21:15 clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure Alexandre Oliva
2013-02-22 1:15 ` collapse concurrent forced allocations (was: Re: clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure) Alexandre Oliva
2013-02-22 15:54 ` Josef Bacik
2013-02-23 14:18 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2013-03-04 0:54 ` collapse concurrent forced allocations Alexandre Oliva
2013-02-22 15:54 ` clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=orvc9jp0zu.fsf@livre.home \
--to=oliva@gnu.org \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).