linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs balance on single device
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:28:21 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$138cb$448d68e$2d9dcb10$fc6a898a@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAAeznTryb7kyuvEyBFniv-UtGCQwdNtZMhpxm=-2MtKZSOj9Tw@mail.gmail.com

Leonidas Spyropoulos posted on Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:28:05 +0000 as
excerpted:

> Oh, so the df report from btrfs doesn't show the total as 'free'! But it
> means how much space the filesystem allocated so far.

Yes.

Btrfs allocates in chunks, 256 MiB at a time for metadata (but on a 
single device, metadata chunks are DUP by default, so two are created at 
once, thus half a gig), 1 GiB at at a time for data (single device 
values, when there's plenty of unallocated space left in ordered to do 
so).  As these chunks are filled up new ones are allocated as necessary 
(assuming there's enough unallocated space left to do so).

But normal usage including deleting old files and rewriting parts of 
existing files (to new locations due to btrfs' copy-on-write/COW 
semantics) will often leave several partially filled chunks around, and a 
balance rewrites chunks, consolidating into fewer new chunks when 
possible as it does so.

That's what the btrfs fi df reports showed, many partially filled chunks 
before the balance, fewer but full chunks afterward, with the freed chunk 
space returned to the unallocated pool.

While btrfs fi df could report unallocated space as well, given the 
possibility of it being allocated differently (DUP vs SINGLE, and on 
multi-device filesystems, the various raid modes), it can't reliably 
predict how that unallocated space will be used and thus how much 
/effective/ free space you have.

But btrfs fi show gives the total filesystem size, as well as the total 
allocated.  So between df and show, plus a little math if necessary, you 
get a better picture.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-15 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-15 20:20 btrfs balance on single device Leonidas Spyropoulos
2013-12-15 20:24 ` Hugo Mills
2013-12-15 20:28   ` Leonidas Spyropoulos
2013-12-15 23:28     ` Duncan [this message]
2013-12-16 23:22       ` Leonidas Spyropoulos
2013-12-17  5:02         ` Duncan
     [not found]       ` <CAAeznTpZ6p1_ZR6xy-YGynAJu88jZ_52AQURuxT4qTeEYLOjdg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-12-18 10:44         ` Leonidas Spyropoulos
2013-12-18 11:05           ` Hugo Mills
2013-12-18 11:29             ` Leonidas Spyropoulos
2013-12-19  8:14               ` Leonidas Spyropoulos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='pan$138cb$448d68e$2d9dcb10$fc6a898a@cox.net' \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).