From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38800 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751550AbaBTKby (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:31:54 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGQv2-00040A-AJ for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:31:52 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:31:52 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:31:52 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: Meaning of "no_csum" field when scrubbing with -R option Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <5304AA69.5020800@informatik.uni-bonn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sebastian Ochmann posted on Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:58:17 +0100 as excerpted: > So my question is, why does scrub show a high (i.e. non-zero) value for > no_csum? I never enabled nodatasum or a similar option. I've no answer but have wondered that myself. So hopefully you get an answer I can read too. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman