From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57111 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680Ab3GNJzE (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jul 2013 05:55:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UyJ1A-0002OA-V1 for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:55:00 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:55:00 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:55:00 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: Troublesome failure mode and recovery Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20130713121404.65fc89ea@Bidule> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jérôme Carretero posted on Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:14:04 -0400 as excerpted: > - `btrfsck` was crashing because the code would progress even if fs_root > was null... fixed with this patch: AFAIK (based on what I've seen go by on the list, tho I'm not technical enough to actually make sense of the patches themselves) there's a still new patch floating around that deals with that one already. It's too new to be in 3.10.0 (tho it might possibly make a 3.10 stable if it hits 3.11), but will hopefully be in 3.11. The rest I'll leave to the experts. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman