From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from [195.159.176.226] ([195.159.176.226]:39221 "EHLO
        blaine.gmane.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752444AbeBEEza (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 4 Feb 2018 23:55:30 -0500
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
        (envelope-from <gcfb-btrfs-devel-moved1-2@m.gmane.org>)
        id 1eiYm4-00041a-RF
        for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 05:53:00 +0100
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: Re: btrfs - kernel warning
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan$3daf3$881c0ef8$2fea06f2$4d40fb38@cox.net>
References: <CALvFGyCYKs_MMB5st-nm463_UBcA859iBDHX8xjRX8eCME7Ytw@mail.gmail.com>
        <a95b4757-c63a-3566-e6ed-9065240a6f1d@gmx.com>
        <pan$c028e$56b76f3d$ec4b4337$c0f444fe@cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Duncan posted on Fri, 02 Feb 2018 02:49:52 +0000 as excerpted:

> As CMurphy says, 4.11-ish is starting to be reasonable.  But you're on
> the LTS kernel 4.14 series and userspace 4.14 was developed in parallel,
> so btrfs-progs-3.14 would be ideal.

Umm... obviously that should be 4.14.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman