From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56625 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758917AbcG1R0D (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:26:03 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bSp4J-0007Ra-Tp for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:26:00 +0200 Received: from ip-64-134-228-15.public.wayport.net ([64.134.228.15]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:25:59 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip-64-134-228-15.public.wayport.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:25:59 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: btrfs fi defrag does not defrag files >256kB? Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20160728105555.GR30795@twin.jikos.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Sterba posted on Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:55:55 +0200 as excerpted: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01:19:01PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> > In that regard a defrag -t 32M recommendation is reasonable for a >> > converted filesystem, tho you can certainly go larger... to 1 GiB as >> > I said. And... I see that the progs v4.7-rc1 release has the 32M default. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman