From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33597 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753732Ab3JCNtT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:49:19 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VRjHK-0006jZ-9h for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:49:18 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:49:18 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:49:18 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: Btrfs balance bug Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Holger Hoffstaette posted on Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:56:25 +0200 as excerpted: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:45:31 +0000, Duncan wrote: > >> 3.11.3. However, it /should/ be in the /next/ set 3.11-stable release, >> as they uncrossed their signals and GKH said he'd pull them this time. >> (You > > There are no btrfs updates in 3.11.4. I know because I just built -rc1 5 > minutes ago and again had to apply some emergency patches myself. I had forgotten whether it was 3.11.3 or 3.11.4 that was current, but that crossed-signals thread is too fresh for the patches to be in whatever's current, thus the reason I said "next" instead of 3.11.4 or 3.11.5, since I didn't know and didn't want to go look which it would be. But since you mentioned 3.11.4 didn't have them, I'd (now) expect them to be in 3.11.5... -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman