From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58594 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096AbcCYB7b (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:59:31 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajH27-0001MS-Po for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:59:27 +0100 Received: from ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net ([98.167.165.199]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:59:27 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:59:27 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: mkfs: allow DUP on multidev fs, only warn Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 01:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1458834973-3199-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Sterba posted on Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:56:13 +0100 as excerpted: > The DUP profile can work on multiple filesystems, the limitation is > rather artificial. Let the user make the decision and print a warning. > > Signed-off-by: David Sterba > --- I like the change, but typo in the commit comment... What filesystems other than btrfs allow DUP? =:^) It's correct in the posting subject. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman