From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51586 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750861Ab3JVNfE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:35:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VYc6x-0007ds-LH for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:35:03 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:35:03 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:35:03 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: btrfs raid5 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: shuo lv posted on Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:30:06 +0800 as excerpted: > hi: > since RAID 5/6 code merged into Btrfs from 2013.2, no update and bug are > found in maillist? is any development plan with btrfs raid5? such as > adjusting stripe width、 reconstruction？ > compared to md raid5 what is advantage in btrfs raid5 ? See my reply to your other post asking the same question from a different email address... -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman