From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43712 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756022AbcBDK5F (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:57:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aRHaw-0002CU-SH for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 11:57:03 +0100 Received: from ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net ([98.167.165.199]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 11:57:02 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 11:57:02 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: Question about a specific error. Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <56AFB598.2020307@gmail.com> <20160201202112.GB8313@carfax.org.uk> <56B0A881.5080403@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chris Murphy posted on Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:17:06 -0700 as excerpted: > The problems look different. You're reporting errors 2000. I'm seeing > errors 2001. I'm not sure what the distinction is; but in my case, > cancelling btrfs check and just rerunning it gives different results. > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111841 You likely know this but didn't explicitly state it, and for others... AFAIK, errors is a bitmask, so errors 2001 is the same bitmask error as 2000, plus another, errors 0001. But I'm not sure what errors those actually are, either. The errors bitmask is obviously targeted at devs who can read the code and see what each bit means, and to my knowledge there's no table posted on the wiki or wherever for non-devs to look it up. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman