From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37368 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752473AbbADDZF (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:25:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y7boM-00067K-TK for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:25:03 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:25:02 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:25:02 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: I need to P. are we almost there yet? Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 03:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <54A7D3D1.10508@shiftmail.org> <20150104025835.02f0d6b8@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Roman Mamedov posted on Sun, 04 Jan 2015 02:58:35 +0500 as excerpted: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:11:57 +0000 (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > >> > What about using btrfs on top of MD raid? >> >> The problem with that is data integrity. mdraid doesn't have it. >> btrfs does. > > Most importantly however, you aren't any worse off with Btrfs on top of > MD, than with Btrfs on a single device, or with Ext4/XFS/JFS/etc on top > of MD. Good point! =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman