From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44253 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195AbbFYEHF (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:07:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7yRL-0008My-Is for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:07:03 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:07:03 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:07:03 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs device remove alias Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Omar Sandoval posted on Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:09:15 -0700 as excerpted: > The opposite of btrfs device add is btrfs device delete. This really > should be btrfs device remove. What about btrfs device subtract? That's what _I_'d call the opposite of add. Otherwise, add/remove instead of add/delete seems fine to me. Six of one, half dozen of the other. [shrug] -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman