From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35110 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751742AbaK3Gqv (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2014 01:46:51 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XuyHR-0003Qb-H8 for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:49 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:49 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:49 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: BTRFS messes up snapshot LV with origin Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 06:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <27BDAC3B-789C-4477-B065-E703CE425F54@colorremedies.com> <546B68F8.6080008@ubuntu.com> <546BA96D.4050805@ubuntu.com> <2A57F99C-80AA-4FD4-AA41-57F02AD4E1A2@colorremedies.com> <546CB531.2060509@ubuntu.com> <20141121042814.GR17395@hungrycats.org> <5470C92E.1070607@inwind.it> <20141123001927.GO17380@hungrycats.org> <5474AF87.6090702@inwind.it> <20141125202948.GP17380@hungrycats.org> <5474FBD9.5070709@inwind.it> <54764F4E.80405@pobox.com> <547981BB.7030206@pobox.com> <5479F971.3030607@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Robert White posted on Sat, 29 Nov 2014 08:50:57 -0800 as excerpted: > To those reading along who don't already know. My explanation below is > factually inadequate or wrong in various places... > > The "type codes" as presented in the various EFI/GUID disk partitioning > tools as 0700, 8200, 8300, EF02, and so on are never written to disk as > such. They are short-hand values (chosen to be deliberately similar to > the MS-DOS partitioning type codes of 07, 82, 83, etc) to select > standardized GUIDs for the partition type field. > I could have, and should have, been _way_ more clear, and/or less wrong. > 8-) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Partition_type_GUIDs Thanks. While I guess we all end up eat humble pie occasionally, you handled it with more rather more grace that I often do, and by taking such a hard line myself I didn't make it as easy as I might have. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman