From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42211 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955AbaILFdh (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 01:33:37 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XSJUF-0000NV-L9 for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:33:35 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:33:35 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:33:35 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: how long should "btrfs device delete missing ..." take? Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 05:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <84a98bc5f667c04ca74ff77b56f537d9@admin.virtall.com> <4A9B52AD-8104-4C31-9BA4-13D329D2F952@colorremedies.com> <6AE06E73-C89E-42F0-9A09-FA92C68DED69@colorremedies.com> <1efa888d-1695-4ad0-8e04-f6b2fe87314e@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Russell Coker posted on Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:19:04 +1000 as excerpted: > It would be nice if a file system mounted ro counted as ro snapshots for > btrfs send. > > When a file system is so messed up it can't be mounted rw it should be > regarded as ro for all operations. Indeed, and that has been suggested before, but unfortunately it's not current behavior. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman