From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Btrfs RAID1 corrupted after crash
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 22:42:48 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$b81be$f24a3d23$40041e1f$3538cdeb@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAA7TVBzRubwy-xUOGFGAJCi+mVvBBwwpqXHs9RRKxjpsrAd_=A@mail.gmail.com
Maximilian Bräutigam posted on Sun, 13 Apr 2014 22:18:21 +0200 as
excerpted:
> unfortunately, I am very very deperate and I highly appreciate any help.
> One week ago, I move my entire system to btrfs to setup a RAID1. I
> created the RAID between device /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc with no partition
> table on normal HDDs. Everything was working smoothly until my computer
> crashed and at reboot I was not able to mount the device (my home dir)
> again and got the following messages:
You did your research before switching to a new filesystem and know that
(as the btrfs kernel config option implies, and as the mkfs.btrfs command
said at least last I used it, tho that was the v3.12 version) btrfs isn't
entirely stable yet, and that (even more than with fully stable
filesystems, where the general principle still applies) you should keep
tested-to-be-usable backups when running it, or by action if not words,
you're demonstrating that you really don't care about the data you place
on it and don't mind if it gets trashed, right?
Good. Then you either have a backup and can simply mkfs from your rescue
method and restore from that backup, or you've demonstrated by your
actions that the data wasn't of any major value to you anyway. No big
deal either way! =:^)
In case you didn't, well, you still have a reasonably good chance at
recovery =:^), but regardless of whether it's recovered or not, do chalk
this up to a learning experience and do your research and have those
backups ready and tested next time, OK?
[snip dmesg output from first attempt to mount]
> So I cleared the cache with trying the mount option clear_cache
Good. First thing to try. =:^)
> but it stayed problematic and I was not able to mount it:
>
> [ 368.159594] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in __btrfs_free_extent:5755:
> errno=-5 IO failure
> [ 368.159602] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in
> btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2713: errno=-5 IO failure
> [ 368.165584] BTRFS warning (device sdc): Skipping commit of aborted
> transaction.
> [ 368.165589] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in cleanup_transaction:1545:
> errno=-5 IO failure
> [ 368.165787] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in
> open_ctree:2839: errno=-5 IO failure (Failed to recover log tree)
> [ 368.227161] BTRFS: open_ctree failed
OK, there's several things to try based on that output...
> Now, if I tried to mount it manually with degraded option enabled:
>
> # mount -t btrfs -o degraded /dev/sdb /mnt/sonst/
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail
> or so.
FWIW, the degraded option could be used if you didn't have both devices
available, but the above dmesg got beyond that, so degraded isn't likely
to help here.
> Now I run btrfsck with repair option enabled but still I cannot mount
> it.
That was a mistake, as you'd have known if you had read this list before
you tried your btrfs test. btrfsck --repair can fix some problems, but
the code is rather new and not well tested and it can also make some
problems it doesn't know about worse, so the recommendation is to try it
last, after all other attempts to either fix the problem or simply
recover the data have failed and the next step would be a mkfs, so you're
not losing anything by trying it anyway. Either that, or run it in
repair mode (without --repair it's OK since it's read-only and thus can't
do further damage) only after being told to do so by a dev who can read
the output from the read-only run and other diagnostics and is thus
relatively confident it will fix the problems without doing further
damage.
> Here you can find the dmesg and btrfsck outputs:
> dmesg: http://pastebin.com/zsaKQ0h1
> btrfsck: http://pastebin.com/xva6uJwT
>
> Please, help me! ;( Are there other options to investigate my RAID or to
> even temporarily mount it to get some data? What went wrong here? What
> can I do? Why is a simple crash making my RAID unusable? Can I use other
> tools for a recovery?
> Archlinux, linux-3.14-5, btrfs-progs-3.14-1
Good. You're using current kernel and tools. =:^)
As hinted above, there are indeed additional tools to try, and there's a
fair chance you can at least recover some/most of the data. =:^) Tho
you didn't do yourself any favors running btrfsck --repair before trying
them. =:^(
Please read the wiki and manpages before doing anything else so as to
increase the chances of recovery without further damage, but there's the
recovery mount option (which often works best with ro), and tools to
bypass the log tree and to recover from previous tree roots, among other
things.
wiki start page (suitable for memory or bookmarking):
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org
Here's the wiki's btrfsck page, which has a nice list of other things to
try before you use it with --repair (and a link to the page of a list
regular with further detail, too), but they will hopefully work afterward
as well. Given the log-tree error in your dmesg, the btrfs-zero-log tool
might be useful. But I'd definitely try mount -o ro,recovery first, and
if that works, get everything to backup before trying anything else.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfsck
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-13 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-13 20:18 Btrfs RAID1 corrupted after crash Maximilian Bräutigam
2014-04-13 22:42 ` Duncan [this message]
2014-04-14 7:12 ` [PARTIALLY SOLVED] " Maximilian Bräutigam
2014-04-14 11:02 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$b81be$f24a3d23$40041e1f$3538cdeb@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).