From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43123 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751297AbaEGMbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 08:31:16 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wi10D-0005Xp-Ok for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:31:13 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:31:13 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 14:31:13 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: Using mount -o bind vs mount -o subvol=vol Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20140504004732.GE9061@merlins.org> <20140507105551.GS10159@merlins.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marc MERLIN posted on Wed, 07 May 2014 03:55:51 -0700 as excerpted: > subvolumes are also used as units of backup for btrfs send. Hmm, yes. Thanks. I don't use send/receive here so forgot about that. >> So my vote would be, for example (modified slightly for posting from my >> own mounts): >> >> mount /dev/sda5 / >> mount /dev/sda4 /var/log >> mount /dev/sda6 /home > > On my laptop: [snip] FWIW, those were examples. I actually have more. > But to each their own :) Indeed. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman