Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BTRFS partitioning scheme (was BTRFS with RAID1 cannot boot when removing drive)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:56 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$c681a$3ae21a4d$ec4516c9$9237ffcf@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E588F10F-919E-405C-8120-7375A2A6885B@colorremedies.com

Chris Murphy posted on Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:15:56 -0700 as excerpted:

> The distros should be pressured to move to grub 2.02, currently in beta,
> upon release. And I think it would be good for Btrfs testers to build
> grub 2.02 beta, and try to break it with various Btrfs configurations so
> that it can be better tested grub release.

On the topic of grub minor update releases (and betas too), do you know 
where I can get a good grub-script-level sysadmin view of what has 
actually changed?

I'm running the betas, but a bit blind as the only update info I've been 
able to find is per-commit granularity, many commits per day, and I can't 
see the forest for all the trees!  I'd be far more comfortable with 
something rather more fuzzy than individual commits, but not so fuzzy and 
opaque as simply version number bumps.

This is of concern to me in part because I directly edit grub.cfg and 
includes, because the meta-level config "helpers" that are supposedly 
intended for "mere mortals" were far more fog than help to me, and I both 
couldn't get done what I wanted to do, and I needed to use the direct 
grub-script level commands anyway, and once I understood them, all the 
extra noise from the meta-level stuff was simply noisy cruft that 
obscured the real operation.  

Since I'm working at the direct grub-script level, I really need that 
level of detail on changes in updates as well.  Not the high-level-meta-
config stuff, not the per-commit stuff, something in between, analogous 
to the grub-script level but in a changelog.

And I need it for the betas as well as the full releases, since I'm 
running the betas.  Which means a changelog with the betas included so I 
could see what changed between betas as well as between general releases 
would be best.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-11 17:02 BTRFS partitioning scheme (was BTRFS with RAID1 cannot boot when removing drive) Saint Germain
2014-02-11 18:15 ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-11 21:27   ` Duncan [this message]
2014-02-12 17:13   ` Saint Germain
2014-02-12 17:50     ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-13  8:50     ` Frank Kingswood
2014-02-13 10:03       ` Saint Germain
2014-02-13 17:43         ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-13 19:37           ` Saint Germain
2014-02-13 17:33       ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-13 18:02         ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-02-13 18:17           ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-21 11:42           ` Frank Kingswood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='pan$c681a$3ae21a4d$ec4516c9$9237ffcf@cox.net' \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox