From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55047 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751104AbaIECFd (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:05:33 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPiu2-0003zL-8f for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:05:30 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:05:30 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:05:30 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: BTRFS critical (device dm-0): invalid dir item name len: 45389 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: john terragon posted on Fri, 05 Sep 2014 02:20:26 +0200 as excerpted: > Everyone knows what raid0 entails. Moreover, with btrfs being an > experimental fs, not having backups would obviously be pure idiocy. > > I wrote that it was "pretty serious" because the situation came out of > nowhere on a low-traffic fs[.] > I'm pretty sure about that because for obvious reasons I rsync the hell > out of that filesystem every chance I get. Mea culpa, then. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman