linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Btrfs scrub failure for raid 6 kernel 4.3
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 02:16:18 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$ce4e4$679c0a1$8ea944a8$22d67149@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1451266276.6320.31.camel@scientia.net

Christoph Anton Mitterer posted on Mon, 28 Dec 2015 02:31:16 +0100 as
excerpted:

> On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 18:23 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> I'd want scrub to immediately fail in a degraded case, because the
>> higher workload added by the scrub itself could cause additional device
>> failures sooner. And that would negatively impact the ability to get
>> the array healthy again with a rebuild - during which time you wouldn't
>> want the scrub running anyway.
> I think that should be the default behaviour, yes.
> 
> Probebly there should be a --force like override switch,... again take
> my example of classic RAID1 with say 6 disks... (which is right now not
> possible in btrfs, I know).
> Now one fails... so it's degraded, but you still have 5 left and you're
> probably far away from complete loss. OTOH you still may want to scrub
> your data during during that time (e.g. to catch silent block errors),
> in that specific scenario.

Scrub needs to be able to run on a degraded array (possibly with a 
--force switch, I've no real opinion on that), for a number of reasons:

1) As mentioned up-thread, btrfs scrub isn't like others; we have 
checksums and being able to do a global checksum-verify via scrub, even 
on a degraded array where repair may not be possible, is a legitimate use.

2) With raid6 degraded by loss of only a single device, repair should 
still be possible (and checksums should counteract the partial-stripe-
write hole that parity normally risks, verify the "repair" and don't 
write it if it still fails checksum).

3) With the coming N-way-mirroring, degraded repair from a good copy of 
an N-way-mirrored block down to two-way should be possible, and indeed, 
that'd be the biggest reason to run N-way-mirroring with N>2 in the first 
place.


But regardless, agreed with everyone, simply crashing must be seen as a 
bug.  If it's not going to scrub correctly, it should exit normally but 
with an error status and printout to STDERR, not crash.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-28  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-27 13:59 Btrfs scrub failure for raid 6 kernel 4.3 Waxhead
2015-12-27 18:29 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-27 23:06   ` Waxhead
2015-12-28  1:48     ` Duncan
2015-12-28  2:04       ` Waxhead
2015-12-28  2:18         ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28 21:08           ` Waxhead
2015-12-28 21:23             ` Chris Murphy
     [not found]               ` <5681BDD0.1060407@online.no>
2015-12-29  0:29                 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-29 20:19                   ` Waxhead
2015-12-30  4:22                     ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-30 18:31                       ` Waxhead
2015-12-30 19:08                         ` Waxhead
2015-12-28  4:02         ` Duncan
2015-12-28 21:17           ` Waxhead
2015-12-28 21:50             ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28  0:39   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-28  0:58     ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28  1:09       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-28  1:23         ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-28  1:31           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-28  2:16             ` Duncan [this message]
2015-12-28  1:21 ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='pan$ce4e4$679c0a1$8ea944a8$22d67149@cox.net' \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).