Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: get more accurate output in fd command.
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 03:53:01 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$cfb2$ba6f2e5a$22f18b38$e1aba3e7@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CA+qeAOo4NT5NEO97YJMq-asQVm4OZUdJECqqojTzjhmso_Jj4Q@mail.gmail.com

Dongsheng Yang posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:02:15 +0800 as excerpted:

>> And in the example, the mkfs was supplied with two devices, so there's
>> no dup metadata remaining from a formerly single-device filesystem,
>> either. (Tho there will be the small single-mode stubs, empty,
>> remaining from the mkfs process, as no balance has been run to delete
>> them yet, but those are much smaller and empty.)
> 
> Yes. One question not related here: how about delete them in the end of
> mkfs?

GB covered the old, manual balance method.  Do a btrfs balance -dusage=0
-musage=0 (or whatever, someone posted his recipe doing the same thing 
except with the single profiles instead of zero usage), and those stubs 
should disappear, as they're empty so there's nothing to rewrite when the 
balance does its thing and it simply removes them.

FWIW I actually have a mkfs helper script here that takes care of a bunch 
of site-default options such as dual-device raid1 both data/metadata, 
skinny-metadata, etc, and it actually prompts for a mountpoint (assuming 
it's already setup in fstab) and will do an immediate mount and balance 
usage=0 to eliminate the stubs if that mountpoint is filled in, again 
assuming it appears in fstab as well.  Since I keep fully separate 
filesystems to avoid putting all my data eggs in the same not-yet-fully-
stable btrfs basket, and my backup system includes periodically blowing 
away the backup and (after booting to the new backup) the working copy 
with a fresh mkfs for a clean start, the mkfs helper script is useful, 
and since I was already doing that, it was reasonably simple to extend it 
to handle the mount and stub-killing balance immediately after the mkfs.


But at least in theory, that old manual method shouldn't be necessary 
with a current (IIRC 3.18 required) kernel, since btrfs should now 
automatically detect empty chunks and automatically rebalance to remove 
them as necessary.  However, I've been busy and haven't actually tried 
3.18 yet, and thus obviously haven't done a mkfs and mount of a fresh 
filesystem to see how long it actually takes to trigger and remove those 
stubs, so for all I know it takes awhile to kick in, and if people are 
bothered by the display of the stubs before it does, they can of course 
still do it the old way.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-11  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-29  2:19 [bug] df reports wrong Size and Avail on raid1, 3.18rc2 Chris Murphy
2014-10-29  2:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-12-09 11:20 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: get more accurate output in fd command Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-09 18:47   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-10  1:08     ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-10 10:53       ` Robert White
2014-12-10 13:21         ` Duncan
2014-12-10 15:02           ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-10 19:05             ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-11  8:23               ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-11  3:53             ` Duncan [this message]
2014-12-11  8:25               ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-10 20:36           ` Robert White
2014-12-10 21:03             ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-10 14:51         ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-10 18:25         ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-11  8:28           ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-12-10 13:59   ` Shriramana Sharma
2014-12-10 14:56     ` Dongsheng Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='pan$cfb2$ba6f2e5a$22f18b38$e1aba3e7@cox.net' \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox