From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs space used issue
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:54:10 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$dd7e7$8a56ef21$d7fa0ab5$d833c283@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2892a866-fdc3-b337-4cd4-2cd4a18b9f21@gmail.com
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:24:40 -0500 as
excerpted:
>> I believe this effect is what Austin was referencing when he suggested
>> the defrag, tho defrag won't necessarily /entirely/ clear it up. One
>> way to be /sure/ it's cleared up would be to rewrite the entire file,
>> deleting the original, either by copying it to a different filesystem
>> and back (with the off-filesystem copy guaranteeing that it can't use
>> reflinks to the existing extents), or by using cp's --reflink=never
>> option.
>> (FWIW, I prefer the former, just to be sure, using temporary copies to
>> a suitably sized tmpfs for speed where possible, tho obviously if the
>> file is larger than your memory size that's not possible.)
> Correct, this is why I recommended trying a defrag. I've actually never
> seen things so bad that a simple defrag didn't fix them however (though
> I have seen a few cases where the target extent size had to be set
> higher than the default of 20MB).
Good to know. I knew larger target extent sizes could help, but between
not being sure they'd entirely fix it and not wanting to get too far down
into the detail when the copy-off-the-filesystem-and-back option is
/sure/ to fix the problem, I decided to handwave that part of it. =:^)
> Also, as counter-intuitive as it
> might sound, autodefrag really doesn't help much with this, and can
> actually make things worse.
I hadn't actually seen that here, but suspect I might, now, as previous
autodefrag behavior on my system tended to rewrite the entire file[1],
thereby effectively giving me the benefit of the copy-away-and-back
technique without actually bothering, while that "bug" has now been fixed.
I sort of wish the old behavior remained an option, maybe
radicalautodefrag or something, and must confess to being a bit concerned
over the eventual impact here now that autodefrag does /not/ rewrite the
entire file any more, but oh, well... Chances are it's not going to be
/that/ big a deal since I /am/ on fast ssd, and if it becomes one, I
guess I can just setup say firefox-profile-defrag.timer jobs or whatever,
as necessary.
---
[1] I forgot whether it was ssd behavior, or compression, or what, but
something I'm using here apparently forced autodefrag to rewrite the
entire file, and a recent "bugfix" changed that so it's more in line with
the normal autodefrag behavior. I rather preferred the old behavior,
especially since I'm on fast ssd and all my large files tend to be write-
once no-rewrite anyway, but I understand the performance implications on
large active-rewrite files such as gig-plus database and VM-image files,
so...
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 13:09 btrfs space used issue vinayak hegde
2018-02-27 13:54 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 6:01 ` vinayak hegde
2018-02-28 15:22 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-01 9:26 ` vinayak hegde
2018-03-01 10:18 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-01 12:25 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-03-03 6:59 ` Duncan
2018-03-05 15:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-05 16:17 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 19:09 ` Duncan
2018-02-28 19:24 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 19:54 ` Duncan [this message]
2018-02-28 20:15 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$dd7e7$8a56ef21$d7fa0ab5$d833c283@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).