linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs space used issue
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:54:10 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$dd7e7$8a56ef21$d7fa0ab5$d833c283@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2892a866-fdc3-b337-4cd4-2cd4a18b9f21@gmail.com

Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:24:40 -0500 as
excerpted:

>> I believe this effect is what Austin was referencing when he suggested
>> the defrag, tho defrag won't necessarily /entirely/ clear it up.  One
>> way to be /sure/ it's cleared up would be to rewrite the entire file,
>> deleting the original, either by copying it to a different filesystem
>> and back (with the off-filesystem copy guaranteeing that it can't use
>> reflinks to the existing extents), or by using cp's --reflink=never
>> option.
>> (FWIW, I prefer the former, just to be sure, using temporary copies to
>> a suitably sized tmpfs for speed where possible, tho obviously if the
>> file is larger than your memory size that's not possible.)

> Correct, this is why I recommended trying a defrag.  I've actually never
> seen things so bad that a simple defrag didn't fix them however (though
> I have seen a few cases where the target extent size had to be set
> higher than the default of 20MB).

Good to know.  I knew larger target extent sizes could help, but between 
not being sure they'd entirely fix it and not wanting to get too far down 
into the detail when the copy-off-the-filesystem-and-back option is 
/sure/ to fix the problem, I decided to handwave that part of it. =:^)

> Also, as counter-intuitive as it
> might sound, autodefrag really doesn't help much with this, and can
> actually make things worse.

I hadn't actually seen that here, but suspect I might, now, as previous 
autodefrag behavior on my system tended to rewrite the entire file[1], 
thereby effectively giving me the benefit of the copy-away-and-back 
technique without actually bothering, while that "bug" has now been fixed.

I sort of wish the old behavior remained an option, maybe 
radicalautodefrag or something, and must confess to being a bit concerned 
over the eventual impact here now that autodefrag does /not/ rewrite the 
entire file any more, but oh, well...  Chances are it's not going to be 
/that/ big a deal since I /am/ on fast ssd, and if it becomes one, I 
guess I can just setup say firefox-profile-defrag.timer jobs or whatever, 
as necessary.

---
[1] I forgot whether it was ssd behavior, or compression, or what, but 
something I'm using here apparently forced autodefrag to rewrite the 
entire file, and a recent "bugfix" changed that so it's more in line with 
the normal autodefrag behavior.  I rather preferred the old behavior, 
especially since I'm on fast ssd and all my large files tend to be write-
once no-rewrite anyway, but I understand the performance implications on 
large active-rewrite files such as gig-plus database and VM-image files, 
so...

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27 13:09 btrfs space used issue vinayak hegde
2018-02-27 13:54 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28  6:01   ` vinayak hegde
2018-02-28 15:22     ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-01  9:26       ` vinayak hegde
2018-03-01 10:18         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-01 12:25           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-03-03  6:59         ` Duncan
2018-03-05 15:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-05 16:17             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 19:09 ` Duncan
2018-02-28 19:24   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 19:54     ` Duncan [this message]
2018-02-28 20:15       ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='pan$dd7e7$8a56ef21$d7fa0ab5$d833c283@cox.net' \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).