From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ENOSPC with mkdir and rename
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 00:04:22 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$e7996$8cc44d40$452539c$35ab87@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5484676.xyTNESz9qN@xev
Russell Coker posted on Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:20:33 +1000 as excerpted:
> The Debian installer has BTRFS in a list of filesystems to choose with
> no special notice about it. I'm thinking of filing a Debian bug
> requesting that they put a warning against it.
>
> What do people here think?
You already have my general feeling, a warning is still appropriate.
For Debian, I believe it's fair to characterize people running stable as
relatively conservative. As such, a warning may be appropriate, but if
they're actually /that/ conservative, is it needed, or will user's
natural inclinations to filesystem conservatism be enough, and a btrfs
warning thus look more serious than it is?
I'd say warn, unless that warning /will/ be seen as "eat your babies"
level, even when it's more "appropriate care and a regular backup program
recommended."
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-02 23:35 ENOSPC with mkdir and rename Peter Waller
2014-08-03 0:28 ` Mitch Harder
2014-08-03 1:52 ` Nick Krause
2014-08-03 2:39 ` Russell Coker
2014-08-03 2:59 ` Nick Krause
2014-08-04 1:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-08-04 8:14 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 9:22 ` Clemens Eisserer
2014-08-04 9:39 ` Chris Samuel
2014-08-04 9:56 ` Clemens Eisserer
2014-08-04 10:24 ` Chris Samuel
2014-08-05 8:06 ` Duncan
2014-08-05 12:20 ` Russell Coker
2014-08-05 12:58 ` Clemens Eisserer
2014-08-05 13:02 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-10 17:21 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-08-05 13:36 ` Chris Samuel
2014-08-06 0:04 ` Duncan [this message]
2014-08-06 0:38 ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-08-06 1:18 ` Nick Krause
2014-08-04 10:09 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 10:22 ` Hugo Mills
2014-08-04 10:31 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 10:39 ` Hugo Mills
2014-08-04 10:48 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 11:29 ` Hugo Mills
2014-08-04 17:09 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-08-05 8:20 ` Duncan
2014-08-05 11:31 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-08-04 11:04 ` Clemens Eisserer
2014-08-04 11:32 ` Hugo Mills
2014-08-04 13:17 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 13:35 ` Hugo Mills
2014-08-04 14:02 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-08-04 14:11 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 14:26 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-08-04 14:47 ` Russell Coker
2014-08-04 15:19 ` Mitch Harder
2014-08-04 10:50 ` Chris Samuel
2014-08-04 10:59 ` Peter Waller
2014-08-04 21:27 ` Chris Samuel
2014-08-10 17:26 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-08-05 8:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-08-05 12:17 ` Russell Coker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$e7996$8cc44d40$452539c$35ab87@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).