From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44080 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081AbaJJDUP (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:20:15 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XcQkY-0003Ok-56 for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:20:14 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:20:14 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:20:14 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: What is the vision for btrfs fs repair? Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <54358C77.2070808@redhat.com> <9251D9EB-5B12-4885-8C6B-FFA10B1CDA24@colorremedies.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chris Murphy posted on Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:58:53 -0400 as excerpted: > I suspect it's unintended splintering, and is an artifact that will go > away. I'd rather the convoluted, fractured nature of repair go away > before the scary experimental warnings do. Heh, agreed with everything[1], but too late for this, the experimental warnings are peeled off, the experimental or at least horribly immature /behavior/ remains. =:^( --- [1] ... and a much more logically cohesive and well structured reply than I could have managed as my own thoughts simply weren't that well organized. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman