From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [195.159.176.226] ([195.159.176.226]:34929 "EHLO blaine.gmane.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756136AbdETCbG (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 22:31:06 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBuAR-0002b2-MP for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 20 May 2017 04:30:55 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: RAID 6 corrupted Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 02:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20170517101523.ylmw4qo2wjsnibfh@angband.pl> <20170518101719.6c9feabe@natsu> <20170519085527.GD24459@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pasi Kärkkäinen posted on Fri, 19 May 2017 11:55:27 +0300 as excerpted: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:12:22AM +0000, Duncan wrote: >> Roman Mamedov posted on Thu, 18 May 2017 10:17:19 +0500 as excerpted: >> >> > On Thu, 18 May 2017 04:09:38 +0200 ??ukasz Wróblewski >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I will try when stable 4.12 comes out. >> >> Unfortunately I do not have a backup. >> >> Fortunately, these data are not so critical. >> >> Some private photos and videos of youth. >> >> However, I would be very happy if I could get it back. >> > >> > Try saving your data with "btrfs restore" first >> >> First post, he tried that. No luck. Tho that was with 4.4 userspace. >> It might be worth trying with the 4.11-rc or soon to be released 4.11 >> userspace, tho... >> >> > Try with 4.12-rc, I assume :) No. btrfs restore is 100% userspace, so we're talking btrfs-progs (thus the "userspace" specifier) version here, not kernel version. And at the time 4.11-rc was the latest progs version, with 4.11 due within a day or two, so "4.11-rc or soon to be released 4.11 userspace" was correct. Of course since then 4.11 userspace /has/ been released, so it'd be 4.11 without the -rc, now. (When I got the CCed email I couldn't make heads or tails since I was missing the thread context, tho the fact that I was dead tired probably didn't help. I just checked the list, which I interface with as a newsgroup on gmane.org's list2news service, after getting home from work today, however, and there the entire thread is visible, as one would expect for a newsgroup, so I could make sense of the context, and realize it was a case of kernel version vs. userspace version confusion. Easy enough to clarify... =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman