* Is there any data recovery tool?
@ 2012-02-21 12:11 qasdfgtyuiop
2012-02-22 12:58 ` Duncan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: qasdfgtyuiop @ 2012-02-21 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Hi,
I'm using GNU/linux with btrfs root. My filesystem is created with
command "mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda" . Today I'm trying to install Microsoft
Windows 7 on /dev/sdb , a 16GB esata ssd. After the installation, I
found that Windows create a "hidden" NTFS partition called "System
Reserved" on the first 100MB of my /dev/sda and that my btrfs
filesystem was lost! I have searched google for help but I got no
useful information. Is there any data recovery tools? Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is there any data recovery tool?
2012-02-21 12:11 Is there any data recovery tool? qasdfgtyuiop
@ 2012-02-22 12:58 ` Duncan
2012-02-23 10:16 ` qasdfgtyuiop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2012-02-22 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
qasdfgtyuiop posted on Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:11:06 +0800 as excerpted:
> I'm using GNU/linux with btrfs root. My filesystem is created with
> command "mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda" . Today I'm trying to install Microsoft
> Windows 7 on /dev/sdb , a 16GB esata ssd. After the installation, I
> found that Windows create a "hidden" NTFS partition called "System
> Reserved" on the first 100MB of my /dev/sda and that my btrfs filesystem
> was lost! I have searched google for help but I got no useful
> information. Is there any data recovery tools?
The btrfs kernel option says:
Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format
Its description says in part:
Btrfs is highly experimental, and THE DISK FORMAT IS NOT YET FINALIZED.
You should say N here unless you are interested in testing Btrfs with non-
critical data. [...] If unsure, say N.
The front page and getting started pages of the wiki (see URL below)
also heavily emphasize the development aspect and backups, and the source
code section has this to say:
Warning, Btrfs evolves very quickly do not test it unless:
You have good backups and you have tested the restore capability
You have a backup installation that you can switch to when
something breaks
You are willing to report any issues you find
You can apply patches and compile the latest btrfs code against your
kernel (quite easy with git and dkms, see below)
You acknowledge that btrfs may eat your data
Backups! Backups! Backups!
Given all that, any data you store on btrfs is by definition not particularly
important, either because you have it backed up in a more stable format
elsewhere (which might be the net, or local), or because the data really
/isn't/ particularly important to you in the first place, or you'd have
made and tested backups (naturally, always test recovery from your backups,
as an untested backup is worse than none, since it's likely to give you
a false sense of security) before putting it on the after all still
experimental and under heavy development btrfs in the first place.
Thus, you shouldn't need to worry about a data recovery tool, since
you can either simply restore from backups (which since you tested
recovery, you're already familiar with the recovery procedures),
or the data was simply garbage you were using for testing and didn't
care about losing anyway.
Never-the-less, yes, there's a recovery tool, naturally experimental
just like the filesystem itself at this point, but there is one. Testing
and suggestions for improvements, especially with patches, will be
welcomed.
It seems you need to read up on the wiki, which covers this among other
things. There's an older version on btrfs.wiki.kernel.org, but that's
not updated ATM due to restrictions in place since the kernel.org
breakin some months ago. The "temporary" (but six months and counting,
I believe) replacement is at btrfs.ipv5.de:
http://btrfs.ipv5.de/index.php?title=Main_Page
The restore and find-root commands from btrfs-progs are specifically
covered on this page:
http://btrfs.ipv5.de/index.php?title=Restore
If you wish to try a newer copy of btrfs-progs (after all, it's all
still in development, and bugs are fixed all the time), you'll also want
to read:
http://btrfs.ipv5.de/index.php?title=Getting_started#Compiling_Btrfs_from_sources
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is there any data recovery tool?
2012-02-22 12:58 ` Duncan
@ 2012-02-23 10:16 ` qasdfgtyuiop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: qasdfgtyuiop @ 2012-02-23 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Duncan; +Cc: linux-btrfs
OK.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> qasdfgtyuiop posted on Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:11:06 +0800 as excerpted:
>
>> I'm using GNU/linux with btrfs root. My filesystem is created with
>> command "mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda" . =A0Today I'm trying to install Micro=
soft
>> Windows 7 on /dev/sdb , a 16GB esata ssd. =A0After the installation,=
I
>> found that Windows create a "hidden" NTFS partition called "System
>> Reserved" on the first 100MB of my /dev/sda and that my btrfs filesy=
stem
>> was lost! =A0I have searched google for help but I got no useful
>> information. =A0Is there any data recovery tools?
>
> The btrfs kernel option says:
>
> Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format
>
> Its description says in part:
>
> Btrfs is highly experimental, and THE DISK FORMAT IS NOT YET FINALIZE=
D.
> You should say N here unless you are interested in testing Btrfs with=
non-
> critical data. [...] If unsure, say N.
>
> The front page and getting started pages of the wiki (see URL below)
> also heavily emphasize the development aspect and backups, and the so=
urce
> code section has this to say:
>
> Warning, Btrfs evolves very quickly do not test it unless:
>
> =A0 =A0You have good backups and you have tested the restore capabili=
ty
> =A0 =A0You have a backup installation that you can switch to when
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0something breaks
> =A0 =A0You are willing to report any issues you find
> =A0 =A0You can apply patches and compile the latest btrfs code agains=
t your
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0kernel (quite easy with git and dkms, see below)
> =A0 =A0You acknowledge that btrfs may eat your data
> =A0 =A0Backups! Backups! Backups!
>
>
> Given all that, any data you store on btrfs is by definition not part=
icularly
> important, either because you have it backed up in a more stable form=
at
> elsewhere (which might be the net, or local), or because the data rea=
lly
> /isn't/ particularly important to you in the first place, or you'd ha=
ve
> made and tested backups (naturally, always test recovery from your ba=
ckups,
> as an untested backup is worse than none, since it's likely to give y=
ou
> a false sense of security) before putting it on the after all still
> experimental and under heavy development btrfs in the first place.
>
> Thus, you shouldn't need to worry about a data recovery tool, since
> you can either simply restore from backups (which since you tested
> recovery, you're already familiar with the recovery procedures),
> or the data was simply garbage you were using for testing and didn't
> care about losing anyway.
>
>
> Never-the-less, yes, there's a recovery tool, naturally experimental
> just like the filesystem itself at this point, but there is one. =A0T=
esting
> and suggestions for improvements, especially with patches, will be
> welcomed.
>
> It seems you need to read up on the wiki, which covers this among oth=
er
> things. =A0There's an older version on btrfs.wiki.kernel.org, but tha=
t's
> not updated ATM due to restrictions in place since the kernel.org
> breakin some months ago. =A0The "temporary" (but six months and count=
ing,
> I believe) replacement is at btrfs.ipv5.de:
>
> http://btrfs.ipv5.de/index.php?title=3DMain_Page
>
> The restore and find-root commands from btrfs-progs are specifically
> covered on this page:
>
> http://btrfs.ipv5.de/index.php?title=3DRestore
>
> If you wish to try a newer copy of btrfs-progs (after all, it's all
> still in development, and bugs are fixed all the time), you'll also w=
ant
> to read:
>
> http://btrfs.ipv5.de/index.php?title=3DGetting_started#Compiling_Btrf=
s_from_sources
>
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. =A0 No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." =A0Richard Stallman
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs=
" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-23 10:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-21 12:11 Is there any data recovery tool? qasdfgtyuiop
2012-02-22 12:58 ` Duncan
2012-02-23 10:16 ` qasdfgtyuiop
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).