From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55684 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753638Ab3JCL4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:56:38 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VRhWG-0002ND-8D for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:56:36 +0200 Received: from p5487603d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.135.96.61]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:56:36 +0200 Received: from holger.hoffstaette by p5487603d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:56:36 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: "Holger Hoffstaette" Subject: Re: Btrfs balance bug Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:56:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:45:31 +0000, Duncan wrote: > 3.11.3. However, it /should/ be in the /next/ set 3.11-stable release, as > they uncrossed their signals and GKH said he'd pull them this time. (You There are no btrfs updates in 3.11.4. I know because I just built -rc1 5 minutes ago and again had to apply some emergency patches myself. -h