From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59556 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751176AbaDNKjB (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 06:39:01 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WZeHz-0006Sh-Fp for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:38:59 +0200 Received: from p5b005a90.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.0.90.144]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:38:59 +0200 Received: from holger.hoffstaette by p5b005a90.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:38:59 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Holger =?iso-8859-1?q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Subject: Subvolumes and isolation Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: So I'm happily using subvolumes and snapshots and was wondering about subvolume low-level isolation. Assuming metadata=single, would a corrupt metadata block in one subvolume's directory tree affect any other subvolumes on the same physical partition, or would the fallout from this bad block be contained? thanks, Holger