From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43805 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753931AbaFPHGY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:06:24 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WwQzl-0004pq-Vb for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:06:21 +0200 Received: from p5b007136.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.0.113.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:06:21 +0200 Received: from holger.hoffstaette by p5b007136.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:06:21 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Holger =?iso-8859-1?q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Subject: Re: Transaction commit: none (default) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20140614160554.GP6584@merlins.org> <539E49DB.80305@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140616014739.GB19071@merlins.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:47:39 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:35:23AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: >> On 06/15/2014 12:05 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote: >> >Taking snapshots is now output this in addition of the snapshot >> >operation. >> > >> >Transaction commit: none (default) >> > >> >1) Is that expected/normal? It looks kind of spamming/useless to me? >> >2) If it's useful, what's the use I'm not getting? >> Addressed a issue that subvolumes reappear after deletetion if poweroff >> happen. >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg29547.html > > I see, thank you for the pointer. > In the case of my script, it's console spam that I wish I could make go > away, but grep -v will do that for me :) > > If it annoys other people, maybe having a -q (quiet) that removes this > message would be useful? IMHO it should be the reverse: be quiet by default and require -v, just as more explicit behaviour also requires additional options. With default options I expect default behaviour. Telling me that the default behaviour happened is just noise. cheers Holger