linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.16 Managed to ENOSPC with <80% used
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2014.09.25.21.21.47@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAPL5yKdt7eTk-+0NP2Y9Aa8zNQqJpujTm31z_ee04OS3DocMXg@mail.gmail.com

On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:05:11 -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:

> Deleting files or dropping snapshots is difficult when it's wedged as
> well, a lot of disk activity (journal thrash?) and no persistent
> progress - a reboot brigs the deleted files back.  I eventually
> managed to empty a single data chunk and after that it was a trivial
> recovery.

That's why I mentioned adding a second device - that will immediately
allow cleanup with headroom. An additional 8GB tmpfs volume can works
wonders.

>> That particular workload seems to cause the block allocator to go
>> on a spending spree; you're not the first to see this.
> 
> I could see normal-user usage patterns getting ignored, but this is
> the patterns of the people working on BTRFS.   Maybe they need to
> remove their balance cronjobs for a while. :)

Well..some remedy is coming:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git/commit/fs/btrfs?h=integration&id=47ab2a6c689913db23ccae38349714edf8365e0a

Not sure how many preliminaries that patch needs, but if you are
comfortable with patching/building your kernel you could give that
a try. I'm sure Josef would love some feedback.

Glad you're back on track. :)

Holger


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-25 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-24 20:43 3.16 Managed to ENOSPC with <80% used Dan Merillat
2014-09-24 22:23 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-09-25 21:05   ` Dan Merillat
2014-09-25 21:21     ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2014-09-26 14:18       ` Rich Freeman
2014-09-27  2:36         ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2014.09.25.21.21.47@googlemail.com \
    --to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).