From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Automatic balance after mkfs?
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:13:40 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2015.06.16.13.13.40@googlemail.com> (raw)
Forking from the other thread..
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:25:45 +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Yes. It's an artefact of the way that mkfs works. If you run a
> balance on those chunks, they'll go away. (btrfs balance start
> -dusage=0 -musage=0 /mountpoint)
Since I had to explain this very same thing to a new btrfs-using friend
just yesterday I wondered if it might not make sense for mkfs to issue
a general balance after creating the fs? It should be simple enough
(just issue the balance ioctl?) and not have any negative side effects.
Just doing such a post-mkfs cleanup automatically would certainly
reduce the number of times we have to explain the this. :)
Any reasons why we couldn't/shouldn't do this?
-h
next reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 13:13 Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2015-06-16 13:21 ` Automatic balance after mkfs? Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-06-18 5:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-06-26 13:44 ` David Sterba
2015-06-16 13:24 ` Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2015.06.16.13.13.40@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox