From: Stephane CHAZELAS <stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs-delalloc - threaded?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:30:07 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnjcncff.cqt.stephane.chazelas@spam.is.invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CALjZLS5iA1TVJCVWSpE+Xg5hG_E1c+LVrFz2EJK2b=Xc7MQw_Q@mail.gmail.com
2011-09-6, 11:21(-05), Andrew Carlson:
> I was doing some testing with writing out data to a BTFS filesystem
> with the compress-force option. With 1 program running, I saw
> btfs-delalloc taking about 1 CPU worth of time, much as could be
> expected. I then started up 2 programs at the same time, writing data
> to the BTRFS volume. btrfs-delalloc still only used 1 CPU worth of
> time. Is btrfs-delalloc threaded, to where it can use more than 1 CPU
> worth of time? Is there a threshold where it would start using more
> CPU?
[...]
Hiya,
I observe the same here. The bottleneck when writing data
sequencially seems to be that btrfs-delalloc using 100% of the
time of one CPU.
If I do several writes in parallel, a few more btrfs-delalloc's
appear (3 when filling up 5 files concurrently), but
btrfs-delalloc is still the bottleneck. Interestingly, if I
write to 10 files simultanously, I see only two btrfs-delalloc
and the throughput is lower.
That's on ubuntu 11.10 3.0.0-13 amd64, 12 core, 16GB DDR3
1333MHz RAM. raid10 on 6 drives.
Note that zfsonlinux does perform a lot better in that regard
(on a raidz (ZFS raid5) on those same 6 drives): 50% CPU
utilisation and max out the disk bandwidth.
--
Stephane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 16:21 btrfs-delalloc - threaded? Andrew Carlson
2011-11-22 14:30 ` Stephane CHAZELAS [this message]
2011-11-22 14:47 ` Chris Mason
2011-11-22 17:01 ` Stephane CHAZELAS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=slrnjcncff.cqt.stephane.chazelas@spam.is.invalid \
--to=stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox