* Parsing multipart MIME
@ 2003-08-15 18:05 Darío Mariani
2003-08-20 18:56 ` SEGFAULT John T. Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Darío Mariani @ 2003-08-15 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-c-programming
Hello:
I'm building a minimal MIME parser, mainly to separate the parts in a
multipart/form-data in a web POST. I was wondering if anyone made the
regular expression for interpreting it. I thought of this:
multip ::= start anychar* (delim anychar*)* end?
anychar ::= <any character including \0>
delim ::= <delimiter>
start ::= "--" delim "\r\n"
middle ::= "\r\n--" delim "\r\n"
end ::= "\r\n--" delim "--"
I have little experience with grammars so this expression may be
wrong. Any ideas? thanks,
Darío
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* SEGFAULT
2003-08-15 18:05 Parsing multipart MIME Darío Mariani
@ 2003-08-20 18:56 ` John T. Williams
2003-08-20 19:35 ` SEGFAULT Glynn Clements
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John T. Williams @ 2003-08-20 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-c-programming
I can't figure out why this code sigfaults when it exits.
gdb only tells me
Program received signal SIGSEGV
0xda64a8c0 in ? ()
and shows the step as being the final "}" in main ().
as far as I can tell this means either one of the linux libraries is wrong
or my code is doing something funny with a buffer.
I'll gladly e-mail a dollar to anyone who can tell me what is wrong with
this short bit of code. Well, I mean what is wrong that causes the SIGSEGV.
_________________CODE______________________
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#define HOST_NAME_MAX 255
int main( ) {
int loop;
struct sockaddr_in *active;
struct sockaddr_in passive;
struct hostent *host;
struct protoent *proto;
int port, activeLen, newSkt, skt;
char HOSTNAME[HOST_NAME_MAX];
int hostnamelength;
int pid;
host = NULL;
proto = getprotobyname("tcp");
if( ( skt = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, proto->p_proto ) ) == -1 ) {
printf("Cannot create socket\n");
exit(1);
}
if(gethostname(HOSTNAME, hostnamelength) ) {
printf("fuck\n");
exit(1);
}
host = gethostbyname(HOSTNAME);
passive.sin_family = host->h_addrtype;
passive.sin_port = htons( 4023 );
bcopy(host->h_addr, &passive.sin_addr, host->h_length);
if(bind(skt, (struct sockaddr *) &passive, sizeof(passive) ) ) {
printf("bind failed\n");
exit(1);
}
if( listen(skt, 10) ) {
printf("listen failed\n");
close(skt);
exit(1);
}
activeLen = sizeof(active);
for(loop=0;loop<2;loop++) {
newSkt = accept(skt, (struct sockaddr *) active, &activeLen);
if( (pid = fork() ) == 0 ) {
close(skt);
printf("connection accepted\n");
fflush(NULL);
close(newSkt);
_exit(0);
} else close(newSkt);
}
wait(NULL);
sleep(1);
close(skt);
return 0;
}
_______________________END CODE________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: SEGFAULT
@ 2003-08-20 19:21 Sandro Dangui
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sandro Dangui @ 2003-08-20 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John T. Williams, linux-c-programming
I can see two mistakes:
First, you have to initialize hostnamelength = sizeof(HOSTNAME);
Second, accept() doesn't alloc memory to return data in sockaddr_in*;
Then, you must define "active" variable like this: struct sockaddr_in
active;
And call: accept(skt, (struct sockaddr *) &active, &activeLen);
-----Original Message-----
From: John T. Williams [mailto:jtwilliams@vt.edu]
Sent: quarta-feira, 20 de agosto de 2003 15:56
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SEGFAULT
I can't figure out why this code sigfaults when it exits. gdb only tells
me
Program received signal SIGSEGV
0xda64a8c0 in ? ()
and shows the step as being the final "}" in main ().
as far as I can tell this means either one of the linux libraries is wrong
or my code is doing something funny with a buffer. I'll gladly e-mail a
dollar to anyone who can tell me what is wrong with this short bit of code.
Well, I mean what is wrong that causes the SIGSEGV.
_________________CODE______________________
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#define HOST_NAME_MAX 255
int main( ) {
int loop;
struct sockaddr_in *active;
struct sockaddr_in passive;
struct hostent *host;
struct protoent *proto;
int port, activeLen, newSkt, skt;
char HOSTNAME[HOST_NAME_MAX];
int hostnamelength;
int pid;
host = NULL;
proto = getprotobyname("tcp");
if( ( skt = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, proto->p_proto ) ) == -1 ) {
printf("Cannot create socket\n");
exit(1);
}
if(gethostname(HOSTNAME, hostnamelength) ) {
printf("fuck\n");
exit(1);
}
host = gethostbyname(HOSTNAME);
passive.sin_family = host->h_addrtype;
passive.sin_port = htons( 4023 );
bcopy(host->h_addr, &passive.sin_addr, host->h_length);
if(bind(skt, (struct sockaddr *) &passive, sizeof(passive) ) ) {
printf("bind failed\n");
exit(1);
}
if( listen(skt, 10) ) {
printf("listen failed\n");
close(skt);
exit(1);
}
activeLen = sizeof(active);
for(loop=0;loop<2;loop++) {
newSkt = accept(skt, (struct sockaddr *) active, &activeLen);
if( (pid = fork() ) == 0 ) {
close(skt);
printf("connection accepted\n");
fflush(NULL);
close(newSkt);
_exit(0);
} else close(newSkt);
}
wait(NULL);
sleep(1);
close(skt);
return 0;
}
_______________________END CODE________________
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-c-programming" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: SEGFAULT
2003-08-20 18:56 ` SEGFAULT John T. Williams
@ 2003-08-20 19:35 ` Glynn Clements
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Glynn Clements @ 2003-08-20 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John T. Williams; +Cc: linux-c-programming
John T. Williams wrote:
> I can't figure out why this code sigfaults when it exits.
> gdb only tells me
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV
> 0xda64a8c0 in ? ()
>
> and shows the step as being the final "}" in main ().
Sandro has already pointed out some likely causes of the segfault.
However, the above GDB output suggests that you compiled the program
either without debug info (without -g), or without a frame pointer
(with -fomit-frame-pointer), or that you subsequently stripped the
debug info (e.g. with the -s linker switch).
If you want to be able to debug a program, use the -g switch for both
compilation and linking, and don't use any optimisation switches.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements@virgin.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-20 19:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-15 18:05 Parsing multipart MIME Darío Mariani
2003-08-20 18:56 ` SEGFAULT John T. Williams
2003-08-20 19:35 ` SEGFAULT Glynn Clements
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-20 19:21 SEGFAULT Sandro Dangui
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).