linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Amit Dang" <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net>
To: Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-c-programming <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding?
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:19:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <013901c59989$ed3d6440$9900a8c0@ispl091> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6a00c8d50508042332245283db@mail.gmail.com

Hi Steve,
    Thanks for your prompt response and the valuable information. But I
tried following on Linux 32-bit gcc 2.96
struct temp {
    long long i;
    char c;
} and sizeof(struct temp) gave 12 not 16.

Regards,
Amit Dang

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@gmail.com>
To: "Amit Dang" <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net>
Cc: "linux-c-programming" <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding?


> On 8/5/05, Amit Dang <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net> wrote:
> > Hi Vadiraj,
> > The statement " Take it for granted you get either 4 byte or 8 byte
boundary
> > but never 1 byte." you made is it generic or just valid for the
structure in
> > question? If its generic then I have a question.
> > Why the size of
> > struct {
> >    char i;
> >    char j;
> >    char k;
> > } is 3 ? (gcc 2.96 on Linux 32-bit machine).
>
> Because the alignment requirement for this structure is 1, it is
> byte-aligned.  A structure is padded and properly aligned only if one
> of its members requires more than a single byte of storage. Take a
> look at this:
>
> struct a {
> char  a;
> int    :0;
> char  b;
> };
>
> its size is 3, since it's byte-aligned also.  This rule does not hold
> for the structure
>
> struct b {
> char  a;
> short s;
> }
>
> since one member, here s, requires more than one byte of storage and
> must be aligned to a 4 byte boundary (4 is the smallest possible
> multiple of 2 larger than 3) resulting in sizeof(b) == 4.
>
> > What I have understood atleast for gcc compiler Linux 32-bit machine is
> > that, Maximum byte boundary is 4.
>
> True for int, but double and long long will always be 8 byte aligned by
default.
>
> > equal to minimum of (4 or field with maximum size (within the
structure)).
> > i.e. for the above example maximum field size if 1 and min (4, 1) = 1,
so
> > structure is aligned to 1 byte.
> > If I have following structure
> > struct {
> >    short i;
> >    char j;
> > } its size will be 4.
>
> True.
>
> > if i modify the above struct to
> > struct {
> >    int i;
> >    char j;
> > } its size will be 8.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> > Now modifying int to long long in the above structure will have a size
of
> > 12 not 16 because byte alignment min (4, 8) = 4.
>
> No, it will have a size of 16 because the alignment requirement for
> this structure is a multiple of its largest member.  long long and
> double is always double word aligned.
>
> Regards
>
> \Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-01 11:43 Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding? Amit Dang
     [not found] ` <6eee1c40508010514517b5b90@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-01 12:16   ` Vadiraj
     [not found]     ` <17134.43470.280296.644313@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
2005-08-02 11:21       ` Vadiraj
2005-08-02 11:40         ` Amit Dang
2005-08-02 16:39           ` Glynn Clements
2005-08-02 17:12             ` Vadiraj
2005-08-03  4:04               ` Amit Dang
     [not found]     ` <673ac06405080402432d0feda3@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-04 15:23       ` Vadiraj
2005-08-04 16:28         ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 16:51           ` Vadiraj
2005-08-05  4:14         ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05  6:32           ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05  6:49             ` Amit Dang [this message]
2005-08-05  7:09               ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 11:19                 ` Glynn Clements
2005-08-05 10:15                   ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 10:53                     ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05 11:13                       ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 11:28                         ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05 11:37                           ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 12:59                     ` Glynn Clements
2005-08-05 11:31                       ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-01 12:27   ` Amit Dang
2005-08-01 14:11     ` wwp
     [not found]       ` <003b01c59715$d3ffef00$9900a8c0@ispl091>
     [not found]         ` <6a00c8d5050801234267dd0f7f@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <01dd01c5972f$5c3b62a0$9900a8c0@ispl091>
     [not found]             ` <17135.20687.821822.269575@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
     [not found]               ` <02c401c59745$2aaa0410$9900a8c0@ispl091>
2005-08-02 11:08                 ` Progga
2005-08-02 11:34                   ` Amit Dang
2005-08-02 11:32                 ` Steve Graegert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='013901c59989$ed3d6440$9900a8c0@ispl091' \
    --to=amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net \
    --cc=graegerts@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).