From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Amit Dang" <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net>
Subject: Re: Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding?
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:19:49 +0530
Message-ID: <013901c59989$ed3d6440$9900a8c0@ispl091>
References: <014001c5968e$4e30ca70$9900a8c0@ispl091> <6eee1c40508010514517b5b90@mail.gmail.com> <6eee1c405080105164cfbbaaa@mail.gmail.com> <673ac06405080402432d0feda3@mail.gmail.com> <6eee1c40508040823165f1df7@mail.gmail.com> <00c001c59974$32b0c9b0$9900a8c0@ispl091> <6a00c8d50508042332245283db@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-c-programming <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>

Hi Steve,
    Thanks for your prompt response and the valuable information. But I
tried following on Linux 32-bit gcc 2.96
struct temp {
    long long i;
    char c;
} and sizeof(struct temp) gave 12 not 16.

Regards,
Amit Dang

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@gmail.com>
To: "Amit Dang" <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net>
Cc: "linux-c-programming" <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding?


> On 8/5/05, Amit Dang <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net> wrote:
> > Hi Vadiraj,
> > The statement " Take it for granted you get either 4 byte or 8 byte
boundary
> > but never 1 byte." you made is it generic or just valid for the
structure in
> > question? If its generic then I have a question.
> > Why the size of
> > struct {
> >    char i;
> >    char j;
> >    char k;
> > } is 3 ? (gcc 2.96 on Linux 32-bit machine).
>
> Because the alignment requirement for this structure is 1, it is
> byte-aligned.  A structure is padded and properly aligned only if one
> of its members requires more than a single byte of storage. Take a
> look at this:
>
> struct a {
> char  a;
> int    :0;
> char  b;
> };
>
> its size is 3, since it's byte-aligned also.  This rule does not hold
> for the structure
>
> struct b {
> char  a;
> short s;
> }
>
> since one member, here s, requires more than one byte of storage and
> must be aligned to a 4 byte boundary (4 is the smallest possible
> multiple of 2 larger than 3) resulting in sizeof(b) == 4.
>
> > What I have understood atleast for gcc compiler Linux 32-bit machine is
> > that, Maximum byte boundary is 4.
>
> True for int, but double and long long will always be 8 byte aligned by
default.
>
> > equal to minimum of (4 or field with maximum size (within the
structure)).
> > i.e. for the above example maximum field size if 1 and min (4, 1) = 1,
so
> > structure is aligned to 1 byte.
> > If I have following structure
> > struct {
> >    short i;
> >    char j;
> > } its size will be 4.
>
> True.
>
> > if i modify the above struct to
> > struct {
> >    int i;
> >    char j;
> > } its size will be 8.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> > Now modifying int to long long in the above structure will have a size
of
> > 12 not 16 because byte alignment min (4, 8) = 4.
>
> No, it will have a size of 16 because the alignment requirement for
> this structure is a multiple of its largest member.  long long and
> double is always double word aligned.
>
> Regards
>
> \Steve