From: David Eduardo Gomez Noguera <davidgn@servidor.unam.mx>
To: linux c programming <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: new threads.
Date: 21 Sep 2002 17:40:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032648046.2161.4.camel@hikaru> (raw)
hello.
I have just read from lwn about a new implementation of threads for
linux
http://lwn.net/Articles/10465/
It says this new implementation is going to make its way into glibc.
Anyone has more knowledge about it?
It also says its a 1:1 model. I dont remember what are the cons of 1:1
to M:1 and M:N
Anyone can refresh my mind? I remember M:N was better because it solved
some problems of 1:1 and M:1 at some cost, but i dont remember which.
reply other threads:[~2002-09-21 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1032648046.2161.4.camel@hikaru \
--to=davidgn@servidor.unam.mx \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).