linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: C programming list <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: library routine wrappers and serious overkill
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 02:13:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17059.41759.788362.757952@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506051727540.5731@localhost.localdomain>


Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   now, i'm as big a fan as the next guy of good debugging (the
> my_CONDITION macro is a local implementation of assert() with hooks to
> a logging library -- yeesh) but, seriously, there has to be a limit to
> just how much debugging you're going to apply to each and every
> string-related library routine.  it does get kind of absurd after a
> while:
> 
> ===============================
> 
> char
> my_str_ch2upper(char const ch)
> {
>     DBUG_ENTER(__FUNCTION__);
> 
>     if (isascii(ch) && islower(ch)) {
>         DBUG_RETURN(toupper(ch));
>     }
>     DBUG_RETURN(ch);
> }
> 
> 
> ===============================
> 
>   is this what you'd call best practice?

It may be that the code was written for a platform which lacked a
working debugger, so the program had to be able to generate its own
stack traces etc.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-06  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-05 21:34 library routine wrappers and serious overkill Robert P. J. Day
2005-06-06  1:13 ` Glynn Clements [this message]
2005-06-06 21:29   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17059.41759.788362.757952@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
    --to=glynn@gclements.plus.com \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).