From: Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: C programming list <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: macros with global variables?
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:44:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17114.6759.545367.971052@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507140830420.4466@mathanlap1.rdmcorp.com>
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> not sure if this is outside the scope of this mailing list but i
> just downloaded the source for a simple SSL-aware ftp client
> (netkit-ftp-ssl), did the configure and the make and got:
>
> ftp.c: In function ârecvrequestâ:
> ftp.c:1127: error: âpdataâundeclared (first use in this function)
> ftp.c:1127: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ftp.c:1127: error: for each function it appears in.)
>
> ok, fair enough, check the offending header file to find the
> following macro definition:
>
> #define is_ssl_fd(X,Y) ( (SSL_get_fd((X))==0) || \
> (SSL_get_fd((X))==1) || \
> (SSL_get_fd((X))==pdata) || \
> (SSL_get_fd((X))==(Y)) \
>
> ?????. so i have a macro which accepts two arguments, but expands
> to include an explicit reference to something called "pdata", which
> does not exist, hence the error message.
>
> i tend to avoid defining macros that refer to anything but their own
> arguments. what might the above mean? is there some well-known idiom
> for C programmers that makes the above, in some way, acceptable?
> (i've perused the code and the object "pdata", whatever that is, is
> simply not defined anywhere. so is there a context in which the above
> makes sense in some way?)
At the risk of stating the obvious, the only context where it makes
sense is one where "pdata" is defined, as either a global variable,
local variable or macro.
Macros with external references are generally best avoided, although
sometimes it can simplify the code signficantly.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-17 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 12:35 macros with global variables? Robert P. J. Day
2005-07-17 8:44 ` Glynn Clements [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17114.6759.545367.971052@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=glynn@gclements.plus.com \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).