linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
To: Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disadvantage of using long long int
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:55:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17404.45980.455312.5228@cerise.gclements.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a00c8d50602220954h324b36a4i2ed432ad5616c65d@mail.gmail.com>


Steve Graegert wrote:

> > In terms of performance and raw speed, is there any disadvantage of using
> > "long long int" instead of "long int", "long double" instead of "double" on
> > 32-bit machine ? Are there any other disadvantage that I should consider?
> 
> On 32-bit Intel machines a long long int (64 bits) is usually not the
> same as a long int (32 bits), the same is true for double (64 bits,
> IEEE754) and long double (96 bits, IEEE845).

In C99 (ISO-IEC 9899:1999), long double is supposed to be one of the
two ISO-IEC 60559 extended formats, which are 80 or 128 bits. On x86,
it's usually 80 bits.

> BTW long long int is a GNU extension and subject to portability.

long long int is part of the C99 standard.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-22 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-22 17:35 Disadvantage of using long long int Reuben D. Budiardja
2006-02-22 17:46 ` Glynn Clements
2006-02-22 17:54 ` Steve Graegert
2006-02-22 18:55   ` Glynn Clements [this message]
2006-02-22 19:09     ` Steve Graegert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17404.45980.455312.5228@cerise.gclements.plus.com \
    --to=glynn@gclements.plus.com \
    --cc=graegerts@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).