From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: extern storage class & multiple declaration
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020822080253.GR10730@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020822075234.20104.qmail@relay1.home.ro>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1371 bytes --]
On Thu, 2002-08-22 07:52:34 -0000, Alina Valea <avalea@home.ro>
wrote in message <20020822075234.20104.qmail@relay1.home.ro>:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Suppose we have:
[
file.h declares a variable,
file.c defines it, but doesn't use it and
some_file.c includes file.h and uses mentioned variable
]
> I know this is entirely correct, but is it an acceptable
> programming habit?
This is not only correct but also done very often. Sometimes, you can't
go around global variables. In such a case, it's better to have a
"globals.h" (declaring *all* global variables) and a matchins globals.c
file (defining them all, possibly initializing them to useful default
values).
This is a _lot_ better than spreading all those global variables over a
zillion .c files, and locally declaring them in any .c file which uses
(but doesn't define) it. That's quite error-prone (eg. small things like
signed <-> unsigned conflicts *will* come up at some time, and you'll
spend a day or two for searching the difference).
Having all global variables (if any exist) iat one place (in conjunction
with a matching header file) is a good thing helping to not do stupid
mistakes...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
-- New APT-Proxy written in shell script --
http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-22 7:52 extern storage class & multiple declaration Alina Valea
2002-08-22 8:02 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020822080253.GR10730@lug-owl.de \
--to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).