From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Elias Athanasopoulos Subject: Re: function pointers in C++ Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:17:59 +0200 Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040318111759.GA804@velka.phys.uoa.gr> References: <31E38B53D182D51195FA00508BE3A334036497A1@zwnbc004.cala.nortel.com> <20040315112849.GA774@velka.phys.uoa.gr> <16470.45491.927067.620232@cerise.nosuchdomain.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16470.45491.927067.620232@cerise.nosuchdomain.co.uk> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Glynn Clements Cc: Sandro Dangui , linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org, Dar?o Mariani On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:50:11AM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote: > If you want a fixed number of Foo's, you need one wrapper and one > static variable for each. If you want an arbitrary number of Foo's, > you're out of luck. Thanx Glynn for the detailed answer. It seems that I am out of luck here, but your answer was very insightful. Regards, -- University of Athens I bet the human brain Physics Department is a kludge --Marvin Minsky