From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw Subject: Re: kmalloc Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 08:12:33 +0200 Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040602061233.GI20632@lug-owl.de> References: <8158840804060115534de05277@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TMJUm4hsTn/F+xXF" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8158840804060115534de05277@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org --TMJUm4hsTn/F+xXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-06-02 04:23:32 +0530, venkata ramana wrote in message <8158840804060115534de05277@mail.gmail.com>: > Will the kmalloc system call fail to allocate more than 131072 bytes > of memory? If so, Is there anyway to change this limit? Just handle it's return code properly. MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=FCrger" | im Internet! | im Ira= k! ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TC= PA)); --TMJUm4hsTn/F+xXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAvW/RHb1edYOZ4bsRAjAOAJ9i6OgHzGj2xC8nDJdgTpex8GQtrACfQgJB 3TPiaWRzG+xOtfGdyiQlLIo= =b55s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TMJUm4hsTn/F+xXF--