linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-c-programming <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: memory_allocation
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:01:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040813130153.GL16935@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <I2DXAF$7B97927BCA10A589B58FC0F34E16A58F@laposte.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1357 bytes --]

On Fri, 2004-08-13 14:27:51 +0200, simon.guinot <simon.guinot@laposte.net>
wrote in message <I2DXAF$7B97927BCA10A589B58FC0F34E16A58F@laposte.net>:
> hello,
> 
> i have a problem with a structure memory allocation...
>  
> struct dns_answer {
>          unsigned short type;
>          unsigned short class;
>          unsigned int ttl;
>          unsigned short rdlength;
>          unsigned int addr_answer;
>          } dns_answ;
> 
> all this element are not adjacent in memory... i have two
> "free bytes" between rdlenght and addr_answer...
> since here, i have alway made my headers like this... and no
> problem...

You can add  "__attribute__ ((packed))" to the declaration of that
struct to force GCC to pack it. However, keep in mind that the gap does
serve a purpose! Accessing those parts at unaligned offsets may cause
quite some speed penalty on some CPUs. However, if it's a binary
structure (as it looks like), that's okay. (NB: Is your coding
endianess-save in that case?)

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-13 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-13 12:27 memory_allocation simon.guinot
2004-08-13 12:34 ` memory_allocation Henry Margies
2004-08-13 13:01 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040813130153.GL16935@lug-owl.de \
    --to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).