From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw Subject: Re: -fomit-frame-pointer + -g Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:15:47 +0200 Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041010111547.GE5033@lug-owl.de> References: <20041010110717.GA3207@jehuty.server01.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PYn5GdOhTT6Zr5C/" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041010110717.GA3207@jehuty.server01.org> List-Id: To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org --PYn5GdOhTT6Zr5C/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2004-10-10 13:07:17 +0200, Ricardo Catalinas Jimenez wrote in message <20041010110717.GA3207@jehuty.server01.org>: > So when I do: gcc -o test test.c -g -fomit-frame-pointer >=20 > What happend, can I debug correctly? Even easier than asking others to dig into your problem, how about just firing up a gdb yourself and have a try? You'd just see the result:-) MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 = _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg = _ _ O fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=FCrger" | im Internet! | im Irak! = O O O ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA)= ); --PYn5GdOhTT6Zr5C/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBaRnjHb1edYOZ4bsRArQ6AJ9OOW4hySQH1vAwpHlcBbxR8ArGpgCfSjcp MweEugnCjMRQNbVADb7PMQ4= =l5jg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PYn5GdOhTT6Zr5C/--