From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw Subject: Re: Assignment make pointers Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:47:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20041213154734.GX16958@lug-owl.de> References: <20041213_100432_025782.r_zaca@ig.com.br> <20041213101011.GO16958@lug-owl.de> <200412130851.44586.eric@cisu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qnuS/wU1MXEWeKjo" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412130851.44586.eric@cisu.net> Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org --qnuS/wU1MXEWeKjo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2004-12-13 08:51:44 -0600, Eric Bambach wrote in message <200412130851.44586.eric@cisu.net>: > What escapes me though is how the compiler could compile without knowing = the=20 > definition. Isnt it REALLY presumptuous and dangerous for the compiler to= =20 The "type defaults to int" thing. This is why the initial writer got an error message that an int type is about to be converted to pointer type. MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 = _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg = _ _ O fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=C3=BCrger" | im Internet! | im Ira= k! O O O ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA)= ); --qnuS/wU1MXEWeKjo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBvbmWHb1edYOZ4bsRAs/HAKCPvllLu8tB+2pZeAy4nJ2Qc3Z4PgCghQcY Mgy3jjwgRuTkGhlJQcRgtqc= =5FIu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qnuS/wU1MXEWeKjo--