linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: newby.-interpreting C
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:17:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220211709.GD2460@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cq77vi$1ej$1@sea.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1607 bytes --]

On Mon, 2004-12-20 20:07:54 +0100, soraberri <421246@posta.unizar.es>
wrote in message <cq77vi$1ej$1@sea.gmane.org>:
> Hi all,
> 
> Anyone could give me the meaning of this definition? Is the 
> __attribute__ stuff what scares me. If you feel like I'm too 
> desoriented, please tell me what should I know first.
> 
> typedef struct {
> 	uint8_t b[6];
> } __attribute__((packed)) bdaddr_t;

Compilers do use __attribute__ to allow programmers to modify the
compiler's behavior in certain areas. "packed" tells the compiler to not
start each variable at a natural alignment (ie. 4 bytes on a 32bit
machine, 8 bytes on a 64bit machine). (That is, the address of a given
variable must be a multiple of 4 (or 8) bytes.)

A "packed" structure is usually used for two things:

	- In device drivers to fit a hardware device's memory-mapped
	  register structure
	- In poorly written programs to store variables into on-disk
	  files to be read back later on by other programs.

General rule: if you don't *need* this for a good reason, or if you even
don't know what it does, you don't need it, since it also introduces a
performance penalty: CPUs tend to be fast at naturally aligned memory
accesses, but quite slow on non-aligned accesses.

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-20 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-20 19:07 newby.-interpreting C soraberri
2004-12-20 19:38 ` Nir Dremer
2004-12-20 21:17 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2004-12-21 15:39   ` soraberri
2004-12-30 11:26   ` Glynn Clements
2004-12-30 11:40     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041220211709.GD2460@lug-owl.de \
    --to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).