From: Rafael <vergandash@ig.com.br>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: File I/O wrapper?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:49:03 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501250349.03476.vergandash@ig.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450f66c05012411557e328fa1@mail.gmail.com>
Some ideas...
Perhaps (i d't like this word but for discussion...) a wrapper I/O 100%
trustworthy one i dont see how without kmod.
Multiple programs realizing I/O is hard, because you need to know who
read/write what and the buffer size of that operation. And it make things
come more complex because i know you got look at programs stack, monitoring
calls by I/O opetarions (eg libc routines - GDB). That is for monitoring
intentions. So a possible I/O reaction system based in logs it is another
history.
There's a tool named fuser, look at the source for some ideas, gdb source code
too.
> I'm working on a new logging system and came across the idea of using
> a program through a symbolic link instead of a file for a log.
>
> Basically I would write a program that logs to a variety of
> configurable sources, and would act as a file when it comes to I/O,
> doing whatever processing I want in between the "actual" file and the
> calling program.
>
> My only hang up so far is actually getting the program to emulate file
> I/O without writing to the program file itself.
>
>
> So in simple terms, I want a program to act like a file, and I'm stuck on
> How.
>
> A FIFO isn't quite what I need, but close, although I need a single
> point of reference to handle all I/O, exactly like a file.
>
> And I can't/don't want to rewrite every potential calling program to
> work with this.
>
> I've been thinking I'm going to have to do a kernel module, but I was
> hoping someone might know a way I can implement this w/o doing a kmod.
>
> I've always been a higher level programmer, interfaces, DB
> access/filtering, etc, so anything as low as throwing a hook into file
> I/O is a little beyond my existing knowledge level, but I'm willing to
> give it a shot.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-c-programming" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-25 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-24 19:55 File I/O wrapper? Dan Gary
2005-01-25 5:49 ` Rafael [this message]
[not found] ` <200501241454.21502.eric@cisu.net>
[not found] ` <1450f66c05012508457a3f123c@mail.gmail.com>
2005-01-25 19:42 ` Eric Bambach
2005-01-30 11:45 ` Glynn Clements
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501250349.03476.vergandash@ig.com.br \
--to=vergandash@ig.com.br \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).