From: wwp <subscript@free.fr>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding?
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:11:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050801161125.716db5ff@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <015a01c59694$80662070$9900a8c0@ispl091>
Hello Amit,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:57:48 +0530 "Amit Dang"
<amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net> wrote:
> Hi Vadiraj,
> Thanks for the explaination but when i try following structure
> struct temp
> {
> char c; /* 1 byte lenght */
> int i; /* 4 byte length */
> char c1; /* 1 byte length */
> long long d /* 8 bytes lenght */
> };
> on a linux machine x86 32-bit with gcc 2.96. It gives its size = 20 bytes
> not 24 bytes (as explained by you)
See below (this applies to both members sorting examples from Vadiraj):
struct padded offset
member size size range
-------------------------------
c 1 4 0-3
i 4 4 4-7
c1 1 4 8-11
d 8 8 12-19
So, 20 bytes. Isn't it right?
Regards,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vadiraj" <vadiraj.cs@gmail.com>
> To: "Amit Dang" <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net>
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 5:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding?
>
>
> > On 8/1/05, Amit Dang <amit_dang@intersolutions.stpn.soft.net> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Can any body provide some light on Byte Alignment & Structure Padding
> > > for gcc linux x86 32-bit?
> >
> > The system expects the address of a variable to be multiple of
> > its size. Meaning for 32 bit x86 int being 4 bytes. The address
> > location of a int variable is expected to be at multiple of 4.
> > ex 0 4 8 12 16. if its double then its expected it to be multiple of 8.
> > 0 8 16 ...
> >
> > In case of structure allignment... this is achieved by padding.
> > if this is the structure
> > struct temp
> > {
> > char c; /* 1 byte lenght */
> > int i; /* 4 byte length */
> > char c1; /* 1 byte length */
> > long long d /* 8 bytes lenght */
> > };
> >
> > c starts at offset x( x is assured 4 byte alligned by gcc), i should
> > start at x+4 as it has to be multiple of 4 3 bytes of padding will be
> > done by gcc.
> > c1 starts at x+9, no padding is required char is 1 byte.
> > d starts at x+16,7 bytes of padding to get multiple of 8.
> >
> > It would differ if you re arrange the struct like this.
> > struct temp
> > {
> > char c; /* 1 byte lenght */
> > int i; /* 4 byte length */
> > long long d /* 8 bytes lenght */
> > char c1;
> > };
> >
> > for same base offset...i will be from x+4 d would start from x+8,
> > there would be no padding for d and c1 at x+16.
> >
> > I hope it helps.
> > --
> > cheers,
> > Vadi
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-c-programming" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
wwp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-01 11:43 Any pointer to Byte Alignment & Structure Padding? Amit Dang
[not found] ` <6eee1c40508010514517b5b90@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-01 12:16 ` Vadiraj
[not found] ` <17134.43470.280296.644313@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
2005-08-02 11:21 ` Vadiraj
2005-08-02 11:40 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-02 16:39 ` Glynn Clements
2005-08-02 17:12 ` Vadiraj
2005-08-03 4:04 ` Amit Dang
[not found] ` <673ac06405080402432d0feda3@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-04 15:23 ` Vadiraj
2005-08-04 16:28 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 16:51 ` Vadiraj
2005-08-05 4:14 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05 6:32 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 6:49 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05 7:09 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 11:19 ` Glynn Clements
2005-08-05 10:15 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 10:53 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05 11:13 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 11:28 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-05 11:37 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-05 12:59 ` Glynn Clements
2005-08-05 11:31 ` Steve Graegert
2005-08-01 12:27 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-01 14:11 ` wwp [this message]
[not found] ` <003b01c59715$d3ffef00$9900a8c0@ispl091>
[not found] ` <6a00c8d5050801234267dd0f7f@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <01dd01c5972f$5c3b62a0$9900a8c0@ispl091>
[not found] ` <17135.20687.821822.269575@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
[not found] ` <02c401c59745$2aaa0410$9900a8c0@ispl091>
2005-08-02 11:08 ` Progga
2005-08-02 11:34 ` Amit Dang
2005-08-02 11:32 ` Steve Graegert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050801161125.716db5ff@localhost.localdomain \
--to=subscript@free.fr \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).