From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@pathfinder.phys.utk.edu>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Disadvantage of using long long int
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:35:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602221235.43058.techlist@pathfinder.phys.utk.edu> (raw)
Hello,
In terms of performance and raw speed, is there any disadvantage of using
"long long int" instead of "long int", "long double" instead of "double" on
32-bit machine ? Are there any other disadvantage that I should consider?
Thank you.
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Dept. Physics and Astronomy
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-22 17:35 Reuben D. Budiardja [this message]
2006-02-22 17:46 ` Disadvantage of using long long int Glynn Clements
2006-02-22 17:54 ` Steve Graegert
2006-02-22 18:55 ` Glynn Clements
2006-02-22 19:09 ` Steve Graegert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602221235.43058.techlist@pathfinder.phys.utk.edu \
--to=techlist@pathfinder.phys.utk.edu \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).